Comparision of intracervical PGE2 gel and transcervical foley's catheter for preinduction cervical ripening
نویسندگان
چکیده
Introduction: Induction of labour is a common obstetric intervention, occurring in approximately 25% term pregnancies developing countries. Pharmacological and mechanical methods commonly used are prostaglandin preparations (PGE1 PGE2) various intracervical catheters (single or double balloon), respectively. Material Methods: Study was conducted Siliguri District Hospital, Siliguri, Darjeeling, west Bengal. 100 antenatal woman admitted obstetrics ward with pog more than 37 weeks were taken for study after applying inclusion exclusion criteria. 50 induced cerviprime gel foley catheter. Statistical analysis done. Results: Mean interval between treatment initiation delivery not statistically significant, tachysystole group B women, rate LSCS NVD similar both groups. Conclusion: It can be concluded from the present that Foley’s catheter {mechanical} E2 [pharmacological] effective agents preinduction cervical ripening which substantially improve bishops score increase chances successful induction. There no significant difference their efficacy, mode perinatal outcome.
منابع مشابه
Comparative Study of Intracervical Foleys Catheter Instillation vs PGE2 Gel for Induction of Labour
Background: Cervical ripening, before induction of labour, is needed to increase the success of labour induction, to reduce complications and to diminish the rate of cesarean section and duration of labour. Pharmacological preparations are in widespread use for cervical ripening but are not free from side-effects and complications. Mechanical methods, i.e. the use of Foley’s catheter balloon, t...
متن کاملEvaluation of non-pharmacological method-transcervical foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol and Prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening
The efficacy of intracervical Foley catheter with misoprostol (PGE1) and dinoprostone (PGE2) for preinduction cervical ripening, induction of labour, mode of delivery, induction to delivery interval and maternal complications has been compared.. Women who were admitted to hospital and met criteria for entrance in the trial were counseled and enrolled after informed consent. Inclusion criteria i...
متن کاملComparative Study of Intra-Cervical Foley’s Catheter and Intra- Cervical PGE2 Gel For Pre-Induction Ripening of Cervix
Introduction: Numerous techniques have been used to ripen the unfavourable cervix to achieve the changes necessary for labour. Prostaglandins are the most commonly used pharmacological agents for ripening of cervix and PGE2 gel is the agent of choice for this purpose. Materials and methods: In present study 100 singleton pregnant women who were counselled & in whom cervical ripening and labour ...
متن کاملComparison of 30-mL and 80-mL Foley catheter balloons and oxytocin for preinduction cervical ripening.
[1] Fansler RF. Laparoscopy in the management of Meckel's diverticulum. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996;6(30):231–3. [2] Landor JH, Armstrong JH, Dickerson OB. Neonatal obstruction of bowel caused by accidental clamping of small omphalocele. Report of 2 cases. South Med J 1963;56:1236–8. [3] Asabe K, Oka Y, Kai H, Shirakusa T. Iatrogenic ileal perforation: an accidental clamping of a hernia into the ...
متن کاملComparison of the Efficacy of PGE2 Suppository and Cervical Foley Catheter with Pre-induction Ripening of the Cervix
Background: An increasing success in induction of labor and subsequent termination of pregnancy in presence of unfavorable cervix requires cervical ripening in order to reduce complications and to diminish the rate of cesarean sections as well as the duration of labor. However, there is no consensus on the efficiency of conventional methods for cervical ripening. Objective: To determine and co...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International journal of clinical obstetrics and gynaecology
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2522-6614', '2522-6622']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/gynae.2022.v6.i5a.1208